This article is devoted to the analysis of public sphere. The author considers R. Koselleck and J. Habermas' conceptions which relate this phenomenon with formation of modern society. The author uses the idea of public sphere as an alternative to the traditional socioeconomic explanations of this process.

1. Koselleck R. Critique and Crisis: Enlightment and the Pathogenesis of Modern Society. Cambridge, Mass. 1988 Habermas J. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Cambridge, Mass. 1989. For further information in Russian refer to: Part II. General theories of the civil society. Chapter 5. Historic critics: Carl Schmidt, Reinhardt Kozellek and Jurgen Habermas // D. L. Cohen, E. Arato. Civil society and political theory. M., 2003. P. 287–349.

2. Talmon J. L. Origins of totalitarian democracy // What is totalitarianism (researches of foreign political scientists) : collected articles, reviews, abstracts, translations. M., 1993. Part 1.

3. Schmidt C. Leviathan in the Thomas Hobbes studies. SPb., 2006. P. 194–195.

4. Furet F. Understanding of the French Revolution. SPb., 1998.

5. Salmin A. M. Contemporary democracy: essays on its origins. M., 1997. P. 283–284.

6. Mah H. Fantasies of the Public Sphere: Rethinking the Habermas of Historians // The Journal of Modern History. Vol. 72, N 1, New Work on the Old Regime and the French Revolution: A Special Issue in Honor of Francois Furet, (Mar., 2000). Р. 156.

7. Malinovaya O. Yu. Ideological Pluralism and Transformation of the Public Sphere in the Post-Soviet Russia // Polis. 2007. N 1.