Real History as Combination of “Power” and “Violence” from the Perspective of History as a Science (Philosophical and Methodological Aspect)
N. S. Konoplev
The paper deals with objective historical reality (“History in general”) reproduced with the time and influencing the way the people’s memory constructs stages of its scientific understanding. Deep antiquity styles itself as the past being presentedobscurely, though, containing a set of archetypes elaborated by memory (performing as pressed information). This vital aspect (possible due to acquainting our memory with the past and archetypes) helps to transform “the history in general”, carried out in time consequence, into history as a science, with the object of the latter being the past and the subject being the process based on artifacts in their subjective and personal adaptation. The author believes that due to it drivers of change in history appear and social relations are directed by progress being the stimulus of the developing European civilization which considered in the paper. The author shows that, improperly using failure of femininity, it has taken wrong direction when “power” is substituted by “violence”. With rebuilding equal relations between the male and female principles “power” will gain its programming authentic status. Tis will happen due to the fact that unrestrained progress will eventually give the pas to class conscious, common to humanity search for reason of life.
“dialectical solution”, actual history, “history in general”, fluidity and stability, archetypes, subject and object of history as a science, history as a science, European civilization, Russian civilization, search for reason of life