рус eng
«IZVESTIYA IRKUTSKOGO GOSUDARSTVENNOGO UNIVERSITETA». SERIYA «POLITOLOGIYA. RELIGIOVEDENIE»
«THE BULLETIN OF IRKUTSK STATE UNIVERSITY». SERIES «POLITICAL SCIENCE AND RELIGION STUDIES»
ISSN 2073-3380 (Print)

List of issues > Series «Political Science and Religion Studies». 2024. Vol 49

Sino-American-Russian Competition and Cooperation in Central Asia: Through the Optics of Game Theory

Author(s)
Cao Huan
Abstract
Geopolitical games of great powers influence the global and regional situation. Since the end of the Cold War, Central Asia has become the focus of the world's attention as an independent geopolitical unit. China, the United States and Russia, as three important centers in the world, have subsequently formulated the Central Asian strategy according to their interests, and Central Asia has become a playing field for great power games. Based on the literature analysis, this paper presents two game theory models, “stag hunt game” and “truel”, and analyzes the rivalry and cooperation of China, the United States and Russia in Central Asia in security, geopolitical and economic aspects respectively. The conclusions are that in the security field, which is mainly related to counterterrorism, the three countries should have a high degree of mutual political trust and choose cooperation, thus achieving the Pareto optimum in the “stag hunt game”. In terms of geopolitics and economics, the U.S. is the strongest state and is on a strategic offensive against China and Russia. On the other hand, the weaker China and Russia have chosen mutual trust and cooperation, achieving a geopolitical and economic optimum in Central Asia.
About the Authors
Cao Huan, Postgraduate, Department of Comparative Politics, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Patrice Lumumba Peoples' Friendship University of Russia, 6, Miklukho-Maklay st., Moscow, 117198, Russian Federation, e-mail: 1042215269@pfur.ru
For citation

Cao Huan. Sino-American-Russian Competition and Cooperation in Central Asia: Through the Optics of Game Theory. The Bulletin of Irkutsk State University. Series Political Science and Religion Studies, 2024, vol. 49, pp. 74-87. https://doi.org/10.26516/2073-3380.2024.49.74 (in Russian)

Keywords
deer hunting game, shooters' game, China, US, Russia, Central Asia strategy.
UDC
327
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26516/2073-3380.2024.49.74
References
  1. Akkazieva G.I. Faktoryi evolyutsiigeopoliticheskogo polojeniyastran TSentralnoy Azii [The Factors of the Evolution of the Central Asian Countries’ Geopolitical Position]. MGIMO Review of International Relations, 2011, no. 4(19), pp. 274-279. https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2011-4-19-274-279 (in Russian)
  2. Aubakir A. Globalnyie aktoryi v TSentralnoy Azii: Bolshaya igra ili Bolshaya vyigo-da? [Global actors in Central Asia: Great Game or Great Gain?]. Public Administration and Civil Service, 2020, no. 3 (74), pp. 68-76. https://doi.org/10.52123/1994-2370-2020-74-3-67-75 (in Russian)
  3. Ahmedov F. A. “Bolshaya Igra” XXI Veka ili geopoliticheskie igryi mirovyih derjav v TSentralnoy Azii [The “Big Game” of the 21st Century or the Geopolitical Games of the World Powers in Central Asia]. News of the Institute of Philosophy, Political Science and Law named after A. Bahovaddinov of the Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Tajikistan, 2018, no. 4, pp. 201-210. (in Russian)
  4. Degterev D.A., Degterev A.H. Teoriya igr i mejdunarodnyie otnosheniya [Theory of Games and theory of International Relations]. World Eсonomy and International Relations, 2011, no. 2, pp.79-89. https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2011-2-79-89 (in Russian)
  5. Kokoshin A.A., Kokoshina Z.A. Ob osnovnyih napravleniyah vneshnepoliticheskoy strategii SSHA v TSentralnoy Azii [About the Main Directions of the US Foreign Policy Strategy in Central Asia]. Contemporary Europe, 2022, no. 6, pp.126-139. (in Russian)
  6. Luzyanin S.G. Vvedenie. Znachenie TSentralnoy Azii i SHOS: ekspertnyiy diskurs [Introduction. The Importance of Central Asia and the SCO: Expert Discourse]. Prospects of SCO development from the point of view of Russia's national interests. Edi. by Y.V. Morozov. Moscow, 2016, pp. 6–27. (in Russian)
  7. Luzyanin S.G. Rossiya – SSHA – Kitay: borba za “Bolshuyu Evraziyu” [Russia – USA – China: The struggle for a “Greater Eurasia”]. Observer, 2020, no. 11 (370), pp. 51-63. (in Russian)
  8. Malyisheva D. Postsovetskie Gosudarstva TSentralnoy Azii v Politike Kitaya [Post-Soviet states of Central Asia in China’S policies]. World Eсonomy and International Relations, 2019, no. 5(63), pp. 101-108. (in Russian)
  9. Nikolaev S. TSentralnaya Aziya v geopoliticheskih planah SSHA [Central Asia in US geopolitical plans]. Russia and the Muslim world, 2012, no. 8, pp. 125-140. (in Russian)
  10. Oparin V.I. Politika SSHA v TSentralno-Aziatskom regione v kontekste natsional-nyih interesov Rossii [The U.S. Policy toward the Central Asian Region in the Context of Russia’s National Interests]. National Strategy Issues, 2023, no. 4 (79). pp. 106-125. (in Russian)
  11. Ponomarev V.A. Ob osnovnyih napravleniyah politiki SSHA v TSentralnoy Azii [U.S. main policies in Central Asia]. Post-Soviet Issues, 2020, no. 4 (7). pp. 445-459. https://doi.org/10.24975/2313-8920-2020-7-4-445-459 (in Russian)
  12. Sirochiddin S. Novaya Bolshaya igra v TSentralnoy Azii: konfliktyi i interesyi Ros-sii, Kitaya i SSHA [A New Great Game in Central Asia: Conflicts and Interests of Russia, China and the USA]. News of the Institute of Philosophy, Political Science and Law named after A. Bahovaddinov of the Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Tajikistan, 2020, no. 3, pp. 150-156. (in Russian)
  13. Bohr A. Regionalism in Central Asia: New Geopolitics, Old Regional Order. International Affairs, 2004, no. 3 (80). pp. 485-502.
  14. Brzezinski Z. The Grand Chessboard: American Primacy And Its Geostrategic Imperatives. New York, Basic Books, 2016. 229 p. https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2011-4-19-274-279
  15. Rousseau Jean-Jacques. A discourse upon the origin and foundation of the inequality among mankind. London, R. and J. Dodsley, 1761, 260 p.
  16. Sarwat Rauf. Changing Geopolitical Dynamics in Central Asia: Causes and Effects. Strategic Studies, 2017, no. 4 (37), pp.149-165.
  17. Skyrms B. The Stag Hunt. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, 2001, no. 2 (75), pp. 31-41. https://doi.org/10.2307/3218711
  18. Wishnick E. Growing U.S. Security Interests in Central Asia. Report of Strategic Studies Institute, US Army War College, 2002, 56 p. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep11890
  19. Gao Fei. Igra v TSentralnoy Azii: kitaysko-amerikansko-rossiyskie otnosheniya posle holodnoy voynyi [The Game in Central Asia: Sino-American-Russian Relations after the Cold War]. Foreign Affairs Review, 2011, no. 2, pp.112-126. (in Chinese)
  20. Sun Zhuangzhi. Bezopasnost v TSentralnoy Azii posle peremen v Afganistane: igryi velikih derjav i regionalnoe sotrudnichestvo [Security in Central Asia after the changes in Afghanistan: Great Power Games and Regional Co-operation]. Studies of Russia, Eastern Europe and Central Asia, 2020, no. 1, pp. 1-16, 154. (in Chinese)
  21. Xu Tao. Geopoliticheskaya evolyutsiya TSentralnoy Azii: proshloe, nastoyaschee i buduschee [Geopolitical Evolution of Central Asia: Past, Present and Future]. Beijing, Cur-rent Issues Publishing House, 2015, 486 p. (in Chinese)
  22. Xiao Bin. Politika SSHA v TSentralnoy Azii: analiz na osnove perspektivyi igryi v ohotu na oleney [US Central Asia Policy: An Analysis from the Perspective of the Stag Hunt Game]. Academic Journal of Russian Studies, 2021, no. 3 (11), pp. 47-66. (in Chinese)

Full text (russian)