«IZVESTIYA IRKUTSKOGO GOSUDARSTVENNOGO UNIVERSITETA». SERIYA «POLITOLOGIYA. RELIGIOVEDENIE»
«THE BULLETIN OF IRKUTSK STATE UNIVERSITY». SERIES «POLITICAL SCIENCE AND RELIGION STUDIES»
ISSN 2073-3380 (Print)

List of issues > Series «Political Science and Religion Studies». 2023. Vol 46

The Difference of Approaches in the Study of the Phenomenology of the Sacred in the Conditions of Postsecular Time

Author(s)
A. A. Kartashov
Abstract
This study includes the search for new ways to understand the phenomenon of the sacred and its impact on the social sphere based on a comparison of selected philosophical concepts of certain authors, revealing the insufficiency of positivist interpretations, the most popular in the practice of the era of secularism. Since the rational projects of Modern times have failed to resolve the internal contradictions of humanity and deprive it of its craving for the irrational, today researchers and analysts are paying more and more attention to the study of the sacred. In this article, having analyzed various philosophical interpretations, we will try to substantiate the spiritual dominant of the sacred phenomenon, prevailing over its positivist interpretations. At present, when the scientific paradigm overcomes the secular format, and the status of a sociologist is no longer replaced by the status of a theologian, for the study of religion as a phenomenon of reality, and not a phenomenon of society, an opportunity opens up to take a fresh look at the real reason for the formation of society from the sacred. This study, through comparative analysis, reveals the limitations of an exclusively sociological view of the sacred and the need to expand the framework in its cognition by shifting the focus to the superintelligent beginning. The latter will allow, in the conditions of post-secular time, to fully and fully explore not only the sphere of the sacred itself, but also its influence on the development of society precisely in the root cultural and historical aspect, in addition to applied ideological falsification.
About the Authors
Kartashov Alexei Aleksandrovich, Postgraduate, Department of social philosophy, ethics and Religious Studies, Kazan Innovation University named after V. G. Timiryasov, 42, Moscow st., Kazan, 420111, Russian Federation e-mail: alexei.kartashov.2017@mail.ru
For citation
Kartashov A.A. The Difference of Approaches in the Study of the Phenomenology of the Sacred in the Conditions of Postsecular Time. The Bulletin of Irkutsk State University. Series Political Science and Religion Studies, 2023, vol. 46, pp. 145– 153. https://doi.org/10.26516/2073-3380.2023.46.145 (in Russian)
Keywords
sacred, social, secularity, post-secularism, transcendental, rational, religious, profane.
UDC
291.1
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26516/2073-3380.2023.46.145
References
  1. Weber M. Protestantskaya ethica I duh capitalisma [Protestant ethics and the spirit of capitalism]. Selected works. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1990, 809 p. (in Russian)
  2. Videngren G. Mani i Maniheystvo [Mani and Manichaeism]. Trans. from German S. V. Ivanov. St. Petersburg, Eurasia Publ., 2001. 256 p. (in Russian)
  3. Durkheim E. Sociologiya. Ee predmet, metod, prednaznachenie [Sociology. Its subject, method, purpose]. Trans. from France A. B. Gofman. Moscow, Canon Publ., 1995, 352 p. (in Russian)
  4. Mistika. Religiya. Nauka. Klassiki mirovogo religiovedeniya. Antologiya [Mysticism. Religion. The science. Classics of world religious studies. Anthology]. Trans from English, German, France A.N. Krasnikov. Moscow, Canon Publ., 1998. 432 p. (in Russian)
  5. Kozlova I.L. Sociologiya religii Iohima Vaha [Sociology of religion by Joachim Wach]. Bulletin of the Moscow University. Series 18, Sociology and Political Science, 2015. vol. 4, pp. 183-200. (in Russian)
  6. Kurakin D.Y. Uskolzayushee sakralnoe: problema ambivalentnosti sacralnogo I ee znachenie dlya “silnoy programmi” kultursociologii [The elusive sacred: the problem of ambivalence of the sacred and its significance for the “strong program” of cultural sociology]. Sociological Review, 2011, vol. 3, pp. 41-70. (in Russian)
  7. Melikhov G.V. Antropologia sakralnogo: k harakteristike predmeta issledovaniya [Anthropology of the sacred: to the characteristics of the subject of research]. Scientific notes Kazan University, Seriys Humanities, 2010, vol. 152, book 1, pp. 110-120. (in Russian)
  8. Otto R. Svyashennoe. Ob irracionalnom v idee boghestvennogo I ego sootnoshenii s racionalnim [Sacred. On the irrational in the idea of the divine and its relation to the rational]. St. Petersburg, Publ. House of St. Petersburg University, 2008, 272 p. (in Russian)
  9. Shilling C., Mellor P.A. Cultures of embodied experience: Technology, religion and body pedagogics. The Sociological Review, 2007, vol. 55, pp. 3-55.

Full text (russian)