The article addresses a set of problems arising in the process of the analysis of development perspectives of interrelations between religious and secular public organizations in the context of building a modern type of civil society. At least three issues are of interest in particular.The first one concerns the question what theoretical and methodological model is capable of creating conditions for partnerships between secular and religious oriented communities. The second issue is deals with revealing possible socio-anthropological aspects of the subject field of such interrelation. And the third issue is concerned with what sociocultural qualities are in high-demand for a constructive dialogue between secular and religious oriented citizens. The meaning and significance of the concept of post-secularism (J. Habermas, S. Khoruzhy, K. Stoeckl, A. Roccucci) is that it acts as a theoretical and methodological approach, aiming at deconstructing the ideas that laid the ground for “the Modern Constitution” (according to Bruno Latour) and searching for meanings that facilitate integrating all of the entities capable of communication and building relationships in the medium- and long-term perspectives of responsible development.

Agapov Oleg Dmitrievich, Doctor of Sciences (Philosophy), Professor, Director, Research Institute of Social Philosophy, Kazan Innovation University named after V. G. Timiryasova, 42, Moskovskaya st., Kazan, 420111, Russian Federation, e-mail: ag.oleg2015@yandex.ru

Agapov O.D. Post-Secular Paradigm as a Theoretical and Methodological Basis for the Interrelationship between Religious and Secular Public Organizations. The Bulletin of Irkutsk State University. Series Political Science and Religion Studies, 2020, vol. 33, pp. 115-121. https://doi.org/10.26516/2073-3380.2020.33.115 (in Russian)

1. Asad T. CHto mogla by predstavlyat' soboj antropologiya sekulyarizma? [What might an anthropology of secularism?]. Logos, 2011, vol. 3, pp. 56-100. (in Russian)
2. Berger P. Falsificirovannaya sekulyarizaciya [Falsified secularization]. State, religion, Church in Russia and abroad, 2012, vol. 2, pp. 8-21. (in Russian)
3. Brown T. Religiya v postsekulyarnom obshchestve [Religion in a Post-Secular Society]. State, religion, Church in Russia and abroad, 2012, vol. 2, pp. 21-52. (in Russian)
4. Karpov V. Konceptualnye osnovy teorii desekulyarizacii [Conceptual foundations of the theory of desecularization]. State, religion, Church in Russia and abroad, 2012, vol. 2, pp. 114-165. (in Russian)
5. Kyrlezhev A. Postsekulyarnaya konceptualizaciya religii [Postsecular conceptualization of religion]. State, religion, Church in Russia and abroad, 2012, vol. 2, pp. 52-69. (in Russian)
6. Naumkin V., Kuznecov V. Blizhnij Vostok: k arhitekture novoj stabilnosti [Middle East: toward a new stability architecture]. Valdai Club. Avaliable at: https://ru.valdaiclub.com/a/reports/blizhniy-vostok-k-novoy-stabilnosti/ (date of access: 10.03.2020). (in Russian)
7. Taylor H. Struktury zakrytogo mira [Closed World Structures]. Logos, 2011, vol. 3, pp. 33-56. (in Russian)
8. Uzlaner D. Vvedenie v postsekulyarnuyu filosofiyu [Introduction to Postsecular Philosophy]. Logos, 2011, vol. 3, pp. 3-33. (in Russian)
9. Habermas Y. Mezhdu naturalizmom i religiej. Filosofskie stat'i [Between naturalism and religion. Philosophical articles]. Transl. by M. B. Skuratov. Moscow, The whole world Publ., 2011, 336 p. (in Russian)
10. Schütz A. Izbrannoe: mir, svyatyashchejsya smyslom [Selected: a world holy in meaning]. Moscow, ROSSPEN Publ., 2004, 1056 p. (in Russian)