рус eng
«IZVESTIYA IRKUTSKOGO GOSUDARSTVENNOGO UNIVERSITETA». SERIYA «POLITOLOGIYA. RELIGIOVEDENIE»
«THE BULLETIN OF IRKUTSK STATE UNIVERSITY». SERIES «POLITICAL SCIENCE AND RELIGION STUDIES»
ISSN 2073-3380 (Print)

List of issues > Series «Political Science and Religion Studies». 2025. Vol 51

Are Old Testament Prophetesses Shamaness? An Anthropological Perspective

Author(s)
A. B. Gasymov
Abstract
The article is devoted to an important topic – the phenomenon of female prophecy in the Old Testament. This problem is considered within the framework of the anthropological model “Old Testament prophets are shamans”. The study discusses the possible connection between the ministry of Old Testament prophetesses and shamanic practices of different cultures. The purpose of this article is to refute the hypothesis according to which the practices of Old Testament prophetesses can be qualified as shamanic. The work uses such methods as historical-genetic, cultural-historical, historical-critical, hermeneutic, comparative analysis, canonical approach, as well as analysis, synthesis and generalization. The paper concludes that the comparison of the Old Testament prophetesses with shamans using the canonical approach does not give the desired result – the detection of “family resemblance” (according to L. Wittgenstein), since these two phenomena have nothing in common except the role of an intermediary. The focus of the the article are the aforementioned problems, which show that at this stage of development of religious studies the comparison itself is impossible: 1) the nature of sources (it is impossible to obtain objective historical data on prophetesses from biblical texts and compare them with anthropological data on shamans); 2) terminological problem (there is no agreed upon definition of “shamanism” among anthropologists, which leads to a methodological conflict – the justification of the choice of certain groups of religious specialists); 3) methodological reductionism (when comparing two phenomena, important elements of their ministry are omitted). However, the article notes that this approach has some perspective – it is the developments of cognitive religious studies.
About the Authors
Gasymov Arseniy Bahrusovich, Postgraduate, Department of the Philosophy of Religion and Religious Studies, Lomonosov Moscow State University, 27-4, GSP-1, Lomonosovskij ave., Moscow, 119991, Russian Federation, e-mail: arseniy-gas@mail.ru
For citation
Gasymov A.B. Are Old Testament Prophetesses Shamaness? An Anthropological Perspective. The Bulletin of Irkutsk State University. Series Political Science and Religion Studies, 2025, vol. 51, pp. 137-146. https://doi.org/10.26516/2073-3380.2025.51.137 (in Russian)
Keywords
prophetesses, shamans, Old Testament, Bible, anthropological model, canonical approach.
UDC
291.1
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26516/2073-3380.2025.51.137
References
  1. Andreev A.V., Gasymov A.B. Vethozavetnye proroki i shamany: sopostavlenie dvuh fenomenov po klyuchevym aspektam (antropologicheskij podhod) [Old Testament Prophets and Shamans: Comparison of the Phenomena (Anthropological Approach)]. Koncept: filosofiya, religiya, kultura [Concept: Philosophy, Religion, Culture], 2024, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 20-36. (in Russian)
  2. Basilov V.N. Chto takoe shamanstvo? [What is shamanism?]. Ètnografičeskoe obozrenie [Ethnographic Review], 1997, no. 5, pp. 3-16. (in Russian)
  3. Gasymov A.B. “SHamanskaya bolezn” proroka Iezekiilya: kritika koncepcii [“Shamanic Illness” of the Prophet Ezekiel: Criticism of the Concept]. Izvestiya Irkutskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya Politologiya. Religiovedenie [The Bulletin of Irkutsk State University. Series Political Science and Religion Studies], 2024, vol. 48, pp. 140-149. (in Russian)
  4. Eliade M. Shamanizm i arhaicheskie tekhniki ekstaza [Le Chamanisme: et les techniques archaïques de l'extase]. Moscow, Ladomir Publ., 2015, 552 p. (in Russian)
  5. Rudolph W., Elliger K., Kittel R. (eds.) Biblia hebraica stuttgartensia. Stuttgart, Deutsche Bibelgesellschaft, 1977, 1646 p.
  6. Childs B.S. The canonical shape of the prophetic literature. Interpretation, 1978, vol. 32, no. 1. pp. 46-55.
  7. Grabbe L.L. Shaman, preacher, or spirit medium? The Israelite prophet in the light of anthropological models. Prophecy and the prophets in Ancient Israel, 2010, pp. 117-132.
  8. Hutton R. Shamans: Siberian spirituality and the Western imagination. London, New York, Hambledon Continuum, 2001, 322 p.
  9. Kapelrud A. Shamanistic features in the Old Testament. Scripta Instituti Donneriani Aboensis, 1967, vol. 1, pp. 90-96.
  10. Lim T.H. An Indicative Definition of the Canon. When Texts Are Canonized. Atlanta, SBL Press, 2017, vol. 359, pp. 1-24.
  11. Miller R.D. Shamanism in early Israel. Wiener Zeitschrift für die Kunde des Morgenlandes, 2011, vol. 101, pp. 309-341.
  12. Mowinckel S. “The Spirit” and the “Word” in the Pre-Exilic Reforming Prophets. Journal of Biblical Literature, 1934, vol. 53, no 3, pp. 199-227.
  13. Muller F.M. Introduction to the Science of Religion: four lectures delivered at the Royal Institution in February and May 1870. London, Longmans Green And Co., 1893, 342 p.
  14. Nissinen M. Why Prophets Are (Not) Shamans? Vetus Testamentum, 2020, vol. 70, no. 1, pp.124-139.
  15. Overholt T.W. Prophecy in cross-cultural perspective: a sourcebook for Biblical researchers. Atlanta, Scholars Press, 1986, vol. 17, 368 p.
  16. Parker S.B. Possession trance and prophecy in pre-exilic Israel. Vetus Testamentum, 1978, vol. 28, fasc. 3, pp. 271-285.
  17. Rhie Y.C. Toward an Authentic Korean Biblical Reading: Shamanism and the Bible in Dialogue. Sheffield, University of Sheffield, 2013, 282 p.
  18. Tonelli D. Note di metodologia biblica. Annali di studi religiosi, 2010, vol. 11, pp. 87-105.
  19. Wacker M.T. Schamaninnen in der Welt der Bibel: ein kulturvergleichendes Experiment. Schlangenbrut, 1997, no. 57, pp. 17-21.
  20. Wilson R.R. Prophecy and society in ancient Israel. Philadelphia, Fortress Press, 1980, 322 p.

Full text (russian)